New Delhi, Delhi, India
Amid the intensifying crisis in West Asia, geopolitical analyst Waiel Awwad has offered a sharply critical assessment of the evolving situation, raising serious concerns about the strategic direction adopted by former United States President Donald Trump in the ongoing conflict involving Iran.
Speaking in Delhi, Awwad described recent developments as both complex and consequential, particularly in light of reports that American pilots were successfully rescued. He termed the rescue as a “very positive development” for Trump, noting that the capture of American personnel by Iranian forces could have triggered a severe political and military crisis.
According to Awwad, avoiding such a scenario has been a consistent objective for the U.S. leadership. He emphasized that any capture or killing of American Marines by Iran would place immense pressure on Washington, potentially altering the course of the conflict and forcing difficult decisions at the highest level.
However, while acknowledging this tactical success, Awwad delivered a broader critique of Trump’s overall approach to the conflict. In a striking remark, he stated that “President Trump is going by a Hollywood script war,” suggesting that the strategy lacks a grounded understanding of the region’s complex realities and long-term implications.
Awwad further warned that American strategic interests in West Asia are facing unprecedented risks. He claimed that more than 13 United States military bases in the region have been targeted and severely impacted by Iranian actions, signaling a significant escalation that could reshape the balance of power.
The expert also pointed to a shifting internal dynamic within Iran itself. Contrary to expectations that external pressure might weaken domestic unity, Awwad noted that many segments of the Iranian opposition are now openly condemning American military actions. He added that several opposition figures have reportedly returned to Iran, expressing a willingness to stand against foreign intervention.
“Most of the Iranian opposition are refusing, objecting and condemning this American attack… many of them have been coming back to Iran,” Awwad observed, indicating a consolidation of sentiment within the country in response to external threats.
This development, he suggested, could further strengthen Iran’s internal cohesion at a time when it faces mounting international pressure. It also complicates the strategic calculus for the United States, as efforts to isolate Iran may instead be reinforcing national unity.
The ongoing conflict continues to draw global attention, with analysts closely monitoring both military developments and political narratives. Awwad’s remarks underscore the multifaceted nature of the crisis, where battlefield actions, leadership decisions, and public sentiment intersect in unpredictable ways.
His analysis presents a cautionary perspective, warning that miscalculations and oversimplified strategies could deepen the conflict and place critical geopolitical interests at stake in an already volatile region.
