NEW DELHI — Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav has raised questions over the Centre’s intent following the failure of the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha, alleging that the move was politically motivated.
Reacting to the development in Delhi, Yadav said that the Women’s Reservation Bill had already been passed in 2023, and questioned the need for introducing amendments to it. He pointed out that despite bringing changes, the earlier version of the bill was reportedly notified shortly before the recent proceedings, making the fresh exercise unnecessary.
He argued that there was no need for another vote if the original legislation had already been formalised, suggesting that the situation has created confusion both inside and outside Parliament. According to him, the sequence of events raises concerns about the purpose behind reintroducing and modifying the bill.
Yadav alleged that the entire episode appears to be driven by political considerations, especially in the context of upcoming elections. He claimed that the government’s actions were aimed more at shaping political narratives rather than ensuring the smooth passage of the legislation.
The Samajwadi Party leader further said that the developments have been closely observed and understood by people across the country, adding that the public is aware of the political dynamics surrounding the issue.
His remarks come amid a broader political debate following the bill’s failure to secure the required two-thirds majority in the Lok Sabha. The proposed amendment sought to advance the implementation of 33 percent reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies, but disagreements over its structure and linkage with delimitation led to a lack of consensus.
Opposition parties, including the Samajwadi Party, have consistently maintained that women’s reservation should be implemented without being tied to delimitation or other electoral processes. They argue that combining the two issues complicates the reform and delays its execution.
On the other hand, the ruling alliance has defended its approach, stating that delimitation is a constitutional requirement and that integrating it with women’s reservation would streamline the process.
Political analysts note that the failure of the bill has intensified the debate over both women’s representation and electoral reforms, with parties positioning themselves ahead of future elections.
Ram Gopal Yadav’s statement adds to the growing criticism from opposition leaders, highlighting concerns over the government’s strategy and the political context surrounding the Women’s Reservation Bill and its recent setback in Parliament.
